The Acer Aspire Nitro 7 from Acer serves as a prime illustration of the significance of each decision made in the construction of entry-level gaming laptops. Each every element necessitates careful reconsideration, with every compromise meticulously evaluated, as a simple $50 can determine the distinction between achieving success and encountering failure. When faced with the decision of prioritizing a higher quality screen or increased storage capacity, which option do you choose? Which is more advantageous: a superior graphics processing unit (GPU) or a larger amount of random access memory (RAM)? High-end laptops possess a comprehensive range of features and capabilities, whilst budget-friendly machines lack the privilege of such extensive offerings.
However, it is worth noting that occasionally one may encounter a laptop that is ideally suited for a specific niche, however falls short of meeting the needs of the ordinary consumer. The Acer Nitro 7 features a 15.6-inch display that above the average quality typically found in this price range. It also offers a substantial quantity of solid-state drive (SSD) storage and a high-performance central processing unit (CPU). However, it falls short in terms of the graphics card, a crucial component for a gaming laptop.
The selection is unconventional, and my initial inclination is that a majority of individuals would benefit more from an alternative Acer laptop, specifically the Predator Helios 300. This alternative model is priced similarly but offers a superior graphics card. However, we will discuss that topic at a later point. Let us commence our analysis.
Different versions or forms of Acer Aspire Nitro 7.
The Acer Nitro 7 might be considered as one of Acer’s most straightforward product lines to navigate, particularly in the current context. There exist solely three distinct variations, ranging in price from $1,050 to $1,200.
The top-tier variant, bearing the distinctive model identifier AN715-51-752B, was subject to our evaluation. Attempt to articulate that phrase consecutively at a rapid pace, would you? In this particular instance, a sum of $1,200 grants the acquisition of an Intel Core i7-9750H processor, an Nvidia GTX 1650 graphics card, 16GB of DDR4 RAM, not forgetting a 512GB SSD storage device.
Subsequently, the subsequent edition priced at $1,100 exhibits a reduction in specifications, featuring 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. The lower-tier variant, priced at $1,050, includes an Nvidia GTX 1050 graphics card from the previous generation. It is important to note that the GTX 1650 is comparable to a GTX 1050 Ti, rather as a standard GTX 1050, making this distinction more significant than it may initially appear.
The $1,200 review model is perhaps the most optimal choice. Indeed, it is possible to operate a gaming personal computer (PC) with a mere 8 gigabytes (GB) of random-access memory (RAM); but, I would advise against such a configuration. The aforementioned factor is sufficient to eliminate the two lower-tier models from consideration, particularly in light of their prices above $1,000. As previously mentioned, a sum of $50 can hold significant value when considering entry-level computers. However, in this particular scenario, I contend that the additional funds are vital. If one is seeking a more affordable option priced below $1,200, it is advisable to consider the Nitro 5 product range.
The process of creating a plan or blueprint for a specific object, system, or structure,
I find Acer’s Nitro range to be intriguing. These devices can be likened to laptops designed for gaming purposes that have been disguised or concealed. However, it should be noted that the argument lacks persuasive elements. If one were to bring a Nitro 7 laptop into the workplace environment, it is likely that individuals would express admiration by commenting, “That is a commendable gaming laptop.” The base and lid’s peculiar pentagonal shape does not successfully deceive observers.
However, it can be observed that the Nitro 7 has a certain level of restraint and refinement in comparison to Acer’s Predator range. The chassis exhibits a flat black color, devoid of the flamboyant red vent covers and highlights commonly associated with the Predator range. The lid of the laptop is adorned with the Acer logotype, with brushed metal etching. It lacks any further branding such as “Predator” or “Nitro,” and notably does not have the distinctive Transformers-inspired logo found on Predator laptops.
This development is advantageous for Acer. The Nitro 7’s design is somewhat assertive according to my personal preferences, and I have reservations regarding the unconventional shape of its lid. However, there are few other aspects that might be criticized. I find it noteworthy that the laptop’s thickness measures less than one inch, which is very uncommon for gaming laptops in the budget category. However, this slim design does result in thermal throttling, as we will discuss in subsequent sections.
Now, let us get into Acer’s initial selection, the Nitro 7. The visual representation. The inclusion of this component is often neglected in inexpensive laptops. While it is certainly desirable to possess, it can be considered a non-essential indulgence. When presented with the option, the majority of manufacturers tend to allocate their limited expenditures towards enhancing the internal hardware components.
The 15.6-inch IPS screen of the Nitro 7, with a resolution of 1920×1080, exhibits impressive visual quality. Indeed, the display in question remains predominantly suited for introductory or basic usage. The viewing angles of the Nitro 7 are quite extensive, exhibiting a commendable color reproduction. Additionally, it surpasses the 250-nit threshold we employ for battery testing. The Nitro 7 possesses a distinct edge over the Predator Helios 300 due to its superior display quality, a characteristic for which the latter is widely criticized.
Furthermore, the keyboard of the Nitro 7 has left a strong impression on me. Although it largely resembles a conventional chiclet slab in many aspects, this keyboard offers a substantial amount of key travel and a distinct, satisfying tactile feedback, enhancing the typing experience with a sense of pleasure. The device in question is classified as a gaming laptop; but, I have found it to be quite satisfactory for productivity-related tasks. In fact, I have successfully utilized it to compose several extensive pieces throughout the course of this month.
I am less enthusiastic about the touchpad due to the lack of actual mouse buttons. I find the experience to be annoying while using a gaming laptop. In principle, it is advisable to utilize a mouse for gaming purposes in all scenarios. However, there are instances where this may not be feasible, and the touchpads with tap-to-click functionality prove to be highly inefficient in such circumstances. The device exhibits a refined and responsive performance, surpassing certain lower-cost alternatives I have previously utilized.
Ports are commonly found in a standardized manner, although the placement of the power input on the right face, nearly midway down the side, is an unconventional decision, albeit not unprecedented. The device is equipped with a solitary USB 2.0 port and a 3.5mm audio input on its right side. On the left side, there are a USB-C port, two USB-A 3.1 connectors, an ethernet port, and an HDMI port. The assortment offered for the entry-level model is notably extensive.
Regarding the individuals delivering the presentations or engaging in discourse? It is advisable to disregard or dismiss them. Similarly, the built-in audio of the Nitro 7, like that of many high-end laptops, is primarily designed for casual web browsing and similar activities. The auditory output is characterized by a high level of noise and a distinct lack of richness, prompting the recommendation to utilize headphones for any content of more significance than a typical YouTube video.
The concept of performance refers to the execution or presentation of a task, activity, or artistic
Thus far, the progress has been satisfactory, correct? Undoubtedly, the Nitro 7 receives high accolades from me due to its exceptional construction and its impressive visual output. It is evident that Acer has placed priority on these components.
However, when considering performance, the viability of the value offer becomes increasingly uncertain, especially when taking into account the $1,200 list price. Once more, the Nitro 7 review unit under examination was furnished with an Intel Core i7-9750H CPU and an Nvidia GTX 1650 GPU, which exhibits a marginal enhancement over the GTX 1050 Ti.
The central processing unit (CPU) is experiencing a performance issue known as throttling. Several laptops equipped with the Core i7-9750H processor have been examined, along with a substantial number of reviews conducted on its predecessor, the 8750H. The anticipated outcome is well understood. In brief, the Nitro 7 demonstrates satisfactory performance in short bursts, as evidenced by its Cinebench R15 results. These scores align with our anticipated outcomes, albeit somewhat below the mean, yet not significantly concerning.
However, HandBrake presents a different narrative. The present evaluation is a more extensive and rigorous examination, wherein the machine is assigned the task of encoding a 30GB MKV file using HandBrake’s Android Tablet preset. Typically, this operation takes approximately 30 minutes for the 8750H and 9750H processors. The Nitro 7 exhibited a time closer to 37, which may not appear to be a substantial deviation, but it stands out significantly when compared to all our tests conducted on the 8750H/9750H processors.
The Nitro 7 exhibits elevated operating temperatures. I reside in the city of San Francisco, which is fortunate to experience temperate climatic conditions, even during the peak of summer. At a utilization rate of 7 percent, the Nitro 7 laptop’s Core i7-9750H processor maintains a temperature range of 55 to 60 degrees Celsius. When subjected to a heavy workload, the device rapidly reaches its thermal throttling threshold of 80 degrees Celsius, leading to a subsequent decline in performance.
Does it have significant implications? It is unlikely. Gaming and internet surfing do not exhibit significant CPU demands. It is likely that the majority of individuals purchasing an entry-level laptop do not engage in activities that necessitate the CPU’s maximum optimization. However, it is noteworthy that Acer has not incorporated improved cooling capabilities into the Nitro 7.
However, the primary disappointment of the Nitro 7 lies in its utilization of the GTX 1650. It is important to emphasize that the GTX 1650 holds a significant position within Nvidia’s product range. The aforementioned graphics card is not of subpar quality, and we have already endorsed numerous laptop models equipped with its forerunner, the GTX 1050 Ti. This product serves as a reliable choice for individuals at the beginner level.
However, the cost of $1,200 for a laptop equipped with a 1650 graphics card is considered high, as indicated by the results of our benchmark tests. In order to facilitate direct comparisons, the benchmarks conducted with Acer’s Predator Helios 300 have been incorporated. It is worth noting that this laptop, priced at $1,200, features a more robust GTX 1660 graphics card (although it was equipped with a 1060 during the time of our review).
The disparity becomes readily apparent when examining the results of the FireStrike Extreme benchmark in 3DMark. In this regard, the Predator Helios 300 outperforms the Nitro 7, as well as the MSI GS65 Stealth equipped with the GTX 1660 Ti.
The aforementioned trend can be observed in empirical gaming benchmarks, as both Rise of the Tomb Raider and Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor demonstrate significant disparities between the performance of the Nitro 7’s GTX 1650 and the GTX 1060 featured in our Helios 300 review model. It is important to note that the present Helios 300 model, equipped with the GTX 1660, is expected to exhibit marginally superior performance in comparison to the previously examined 1060.
There exist compromises, naturally. As previously indicated, the Predator Helios 300 has consistently exhibited a diminished display quality. Additionally, the device features a 256GB SSD, which may not be optimal for intensive gaming purposes currently, but it can be readily expanded. It is worth noting that the device is significantly bulkier and heavier, and its battery life is comparatively worse, as depicted in the provided chart.
Once more, it can be argued that entry-level gaming laptops are characterized by a range of trade-offs. However, it remains uncertain whether Acer’s decision to compromise on the graphics card aligns with the laptop’s primary objective. The Nitro 7 has a commendable level of craftsmanship; however, its gaming capabilities are significantly constrained. Moreover, it faces direct competition in terms of cost-effectiveness from Acer’s own gaming laptop, which boasts superior specifications and enjoys the status of being the number one product in its category on Amazon.
The Nitro 7 presents itself as a compelling option for cost-conscious consumers seeking an improved visual experience and aesthetically pleasing design, or those who may have reservations about increasing their storage independently. However, in the case of the majority of individuals? The Predator Helios 300 is arguably the superior choice. This approach allocates financial resources strategically, prioritizing areas of importance while making cost-saving measures in less conspicuous or restrictive areas.
In conclusion, Acer Nitro 7
However, Acer has ample space within its product range to accommodate alternative options. As previously mentioned, the Nitro 7 can be considered a suitable option for individuals seeking a particular product. The current configuration lacks optimal efficiency, and from a personal standpoint, I would prefer allocating my funds towards enhancing performance. However, one could perhaps have a high level of satisfaction with the Nitro 7. The Nitro 7 demonstrates its strengths in unexpected areas, often surpassing expectations for a cheap laptop, despite certain compromises made in other aspects.
Will it achieve widespread popularity and success, comparable to the Predator Helios 300? However, it should be noted that only a limited number of entry-level laptops provide such capabilities. In the context of financial constraints and the pursuit of cost-effectiveness, Acer’s willingness to prioritize its own products over others is a strategic decision that acknowledges the difficulty of distinguishing oneself in the market. This issue is likely to be desired by other manufacturers.
View this post on Instagram